Post by Hristo on Feb 24, 2010 10:27:57 GMT -5
I mean philadelphica/ixocarpa. I'm too confused wheter or not this philadelphica is main name/synonym/ or different species. M.M.P.N.D. even doesn't mention philadelphica:
www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Physalis.html
While USDA gives ixocarpa as syn. for philadelphica
Latinska synonymer too gives ixocarpa as synonym:
www2.nrm.se/fbo/chk/htmlsyn.htm
So I'm still cofused. Probably this means that philadelphica was the oldest name given to this species. Then someone identifies it again and gives it ixocarpa name, which was widely used until recently. Now acording botanists rules they bring back the first given name as main. This is just a guess, because this happens very often.
Edit: According to the IPNI the first philadelphica record is from 1786:
www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=817532-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DPhysalis%2B%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dphiladelphica%26output_format%3Dnormal
and the first ixocarpa record is from 1819:
www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=817444-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DPhysalis%2B%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dixocarpa%26output_format%3Dnormal
www.plantnames.unimelb.edu.au/Sorting/Physalis.html
While USDA gives ixocarpa as syn. for philadelphica
Latinska synonymer too gives ixocarpa as synonym:
www2.nrm.se/fbo/chk/htmlsyn.htm
So I'm still cofused. Probably this means that philadelphica was the oldest name given to this species. Then someone identifies it again and gives it ixocarpa name, which was widely used until recently. Now acording botanists rules they bring back the first given name as main. This is just a guess, because this happens very often.
Edit: According to the IPNI the first philadelphica record is from 1786:
www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=817532-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DPhysalis%2B%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dphiladelphica%26output_format%3Dnormal
and the first ixocarpa record is from 1819:
www.ipni.org/ipni/idPlantNameSearch.do?id=817444-1&back_page=%2Fipni%2FeditAdvPlantNameSearch.do%3Ffind_infragenus%3D%26find_isAPNIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_geoUnit%3D%26find_includePublicationAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_addedSince%3D%26find_family%3D%26find_genus%3DPhysalis%2B%26find_sortByFamily%3Dtrue%26find_isGCIRecord%3Dtrue%26find_infrafamily%3D%26find_rankToReturn%3Dall%26find_publicationTitle%3D%26find_authorAbbrev%3D%26find_infraspecies%3D%26find_includeBasionymAuthors%3Dtrue%26find_modifiedSince%3D%26find_isIKRecord%3Dtrue%26find_species%3Dixocarpa%26output_format%3Dnormal