|
Post by Joseph Lofthouse on Jan 25, 2014 12:51:38 GMT -5
So let's say that you have a P. Lunatus x P. Polystachios. Would the P. Lunatus (first listed parent) be the female parent and the P. Polystachios (second listed) be the pollen donor? Still learning here... That's the academic standard. Small scale breeders in home gardens don't always follow that standard. But they only switch it around 50% of the time...
|
|
|
Post by blackox on Jan 25, 2014 16:04:53 GMT -5
Thanks Joseph!
I'm experimenting with different poultry crosses and also have some projects dealing with crops in mind. When it comes to poultry I'll just list what breed the hen/cock is in the cross.
"Rhode Island Red (Hen) x Copper Maran (Cock)"
Nicolas! Have you found any more useful information yet?
|
|
|
Post by nicollas on Jan 26, 2014 2:56:39 GMT -5
No blackox I think i've finished to retrieve all relevant paper at this stade.Next stade is to understand all the biology terms involved, cause i can't still not figure how a "steril hybrid can give rise to a fairly fertile amphidiploid"
|
|
|
Post by blackox on Jan 26, 2014 13:46:15 GMT -5
This is from an online dictionary -
am·phi·dip·loid (ăm′fĭ-dĭp′loid) adj. Having a diploid set of chromosomes derived from each parent. n. An organism or individual having a diploid set of chromosomes derived from each parent. am′phi·dip′loid·y n.
Hope it helps!
|
|
|
Post by cletus on Jan 26, 2014 20:28:04 GMT -5
So the sterile hybrid just has 1 chromosome from each parent (diploid, 2n=22), which they then doubled (chemicals?), resulting in the fertile amphidiploid (4n=44). Is that right? I haven't read the paper yet just guessing. Doubling the chromosome number of a sterile hybrid said to often restore fertility in the hybrid.
|
|
|
Post by blueadzuki on Jan 28, 2014 6:53:52 GMT -5
Right idea, wrong n number. Most sterile cultivars are actually 3n or 5n or some other odd number of n. You usually get this by crossing a parent whose tetraploid (4n) with a normal diploid (2n). odd N numbers are sterile because the chromasomes can't pair up to divide. The doubling makes them fertile agian because the number is now even (6n 8n etc) so there are pairs again. This is also sort of what is happening in the cross. going by simple chromasome count, the cross is diploid, However because the chromasomes of each parent are so different they can line up either so it funcions as if it was 1n. The dubling provides each chromasome with a partner, and so it becomes 2n again (alibiet, a 2n in which the number "n" represents is now twice what it was for either parent.)
|
|
|
Post by cletus on Jan 28, 2014 22:18:59 GMT -5
thank you for the clear explanation, Blueadzuki!
|
|
|
Post by nicollas on Feb 24, 2014 8:30:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by khoomeizhi on Mar 8, 2014 20:24:52 GMT -5
oops. thread had a second page.
|
|
|
Post by trixtrax on Mar 9, 2014 0:02:57 GMT -5
Cool research nicollas, looks like P. polystachios x P. coccineus is very plausible. I seem to remember seeing in a paper that P. coccineus can be found in a more bushy form in its native habitat? Looking up the species intermediary between the two, one seems interesting as well. Maybe to try interspecific crosses with P. polystachios? Phaseolus ritensis used as a food plant in its range: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phaseolus_ritensisPhaseolus metcalfei (syn Phaseolus maculatus?) couldn't find anything about this being used as food.
|
|
|
Post by trixtrax on Mar 9, 2014 0:08:54 GMT -5
Phaseolus ritensis is also in the Polystachios Group according to that paper above. Maybe an interspecific crossed-up genepool would provide compatibility to make a cross with P. coccineus?
|
|
|
Post by nicollas on Mar 11, 2014 4:19:07 GMT -5
trixtrax: P. ritensis seems to have a very limited range (Arizona and New Mexico) that may not be suitable for my growing conditions.
One of the advantages of choosing P. lunatus as the mother is that it is easy to see if it is an hybrid at the seedling phase.
|
|
|
Post by oxbowfarm on Mar 12, 2014 7:13:21 GMT -5
It seems there are not very much pole lima beans varieties. * Florida Butter Speckled is interesting because it seems early (68 days) * Big Mama has huge pods * Christmas has colored seeds, maybe it can be easier to see cross pollination thanks to that ? Coming in late to this conversation, finding it very interesting. I wanted to mention re: availability of pole limas, there are lots of them. Even in the impoverished 2014 SSE yearbook, there are 90+ different pole lima varieties. Much more than the number of bush limas. Is there any record in your literature searchs of a coccineusXpolystachios hybridization? It seems like they have a lot of characteristics in common. Perenniality, hypogeal germination, etc. One assumes that those traits are basal or potentially basal to phaseolus and would still be on homologous chromosomes. It also seems like the two species can offer a lot to each other, polystachios has cold tolerance and resistance, coccineus has huge seed size, non shattering pods, etc.
|
|
|
Post by nicollas on Mar 12, 2014 8:42:25 GMT -5
Hi,
yes it seems to have more diversity that i've seen in Us nursery. I've ordered a bunch of pole lima beans from IPK genebank. For this project the most interesting are in the "potato group", that has big seeds and are perennial (and pole i guess).
I've found no mention on such a cross, but it is maybe because, as you said, they have a lot in common so there was no point to cross them (adding perenniality is the holy grail of permaculturists but not much of Big Ag). P. Polystachios has been used only to add hypogeal germination to lima beans. No point of having perenniality for the scientists (in fact Lorz used an annual lima bean for the cross).
I think it is a good idea to make an interspecific cross with runners too. But no known way to spot hybrids (maybe the way the seedling turn around the support ?).
|
|
|
Post by nicollas on Mar 12, 2014 10:41:09 GMT -5
My most advanced seedling : I've get 7 seedlings out of my 10 seeds, not bad. Treatment: cold stratification, scarification with sand paper, and in warm water for 24h. But it may have some unnecessary steps.
|
|